<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic G2 Commercial Seemingly Shot with Canon 5D Mark II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html</link>
	<description>A professional photography blog by the editors of Photo District News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:33:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Vane</title>
		<link>http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Vane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-241</guid>
		<description>They pulled the video on youtube, anyone got another link to it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They pulled the video on youtube, anyone got another link to it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebPic</title>
		<link>http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>ebPic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Kinda nice to see (ex ;-P) pro-producers using HDSLRs for commercial work though!
TBH its not *that* bad using other peoples products in the making of your own commercials. I bet alot of car commercials are shot from camera cars which are not the brand of the car being shot.
Releasing a BTS showing it so obviously is stupid though. Can&#039;t beleive nobody at Pana noticed this on the BTS. Why release the BTS if it obviously shows you demonstrating someone elses product.
Is it mirrored anywhere? Seems to have vanished of youtube now!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda nice to see (ex ;-P) pro-producers using HDSLRs for commercial work though!<br />
TBH its not *that* bad using other peoples products in the making of your own commercials. I bet alot of car commercials are shot from camera cars which are not the brand of the car being shot.<br />
Releasing a BTS showing it so obviously is stupid though. Can&#8217;t beleive nobody at Pana noticed this on the BTS. Why release the BTS if it obviously shows you demonstrating someone elses product.<br />
Is it mirrored anywhere? Seems to have vanished of youtube now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitor M.</title>
		<link>http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitor M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-239</guid>
		<description>At least Olympus made their commercial using their own gear :D
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6DijVApReI&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6DijVApReI&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Olympus made their commercial using their own gear <img src='http://pdnpulse.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6DijVApReI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6DijVApReI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpy</title>
		<link>http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-238</guid>
		<description>@amused: Well, Olympus seems to be doing just the opposite - aggressively promoting the fact that their Olympus PEN E-PL1 commercial was in fact shot with one. Highly effective too, in my opinion. No better way to sell it.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E25em-brl8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E25em-brl8&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@amused: Well, Olympus seems to be doing just the opposite &#8211; aggressively promoting the fact that their Olympus PEN E-PL1 commercial was in fact shot with one. Highly effective too, in my opinion. No better way to sell it.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E25em-brl8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E25em-brl8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amused</title>
		<link>http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>amused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-237</guid>
		<description>it is the production house&#039;s prerogative on what equipment they want to use. panasonic hired the ad agency and production house for their idea, not based on what equipment they use. if panasonic dictates that they use only panasonic video cameras to shoot this ad beause THIS IS A PANASONIC CAMERA AD, they will be compromising the creativity, quality of the ad - since the director and crew is probably used to their own equipment. i don&#039;t need to bring in time sensitive schedule and budget to retrain crew to use new equipment, do i?
i cannot believe how stupid and narrow minded some people are to be debating this. stop being shit stirrers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is the production house&#8217;s prerogative on what equipment they want to use. panasonic hired the ad agency and production house for their idea, not based on what equipment they use. if panasonic dictates that they use only panasonic video cameras to shoot this ad beause THIS IS A PANASONIC CAMERA AD, they will be compromising the creativity, quality of the ad &#8211; since the director and crew is probably used to their own equipment. i don&#8217;t need to bring in time sensitive schedule and budget to retrain crew to use new equipment, do i?<br />
i cannot believe how stupid and narrow minded some people are to be debating this. stop being shit stirrers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TR</title>
		<link>http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>TR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Nikon has no market share in the video professional market. And Canon is way behind Sony.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon has no market share in the video professional market. And Canon is way behind Sony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ant</title>
		<link>http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Regardless, they are committing fraud no? Shame Lumix/Panasonic. Someone is going to get fired over this. Too bad, they actually make pretty fair point and shoots.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless, they are committing fraud no? Shame Lumix/Panasonic. Someone is going to get fired over this. Too bad, they actually make pretty fair point and shoots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Panasonic gear actually shows up quite frequently in the professional film and video world, Iain.  Not this Lumix camera perhaps.  But D5 and plasma and LCD monitors are in all of the professional facilities, FYI.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panasonic gear actually shows up quite frequently in the professional film and video world, Iain.  Not this Lumix camera perhaps.  But D5 and plasma and LCD monitors are in all of the professional facilities, FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain</title>
		<link>http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdnpulse.com/2010/06/panasonic-g2-commercial-seemingly-shot-with-canon-5d-mark-ii.html#comment-233</guid>
		<description>/care
Like the professional teams behind fotography and film are going to use Panasonic equipment. Nikon and Canon are leading in the professional market, so it would be *logical* to see teams all over the world use Canon or Nikon.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/care<br />
Like the professional teams behind fotography and film are going to use Panasonic equipment. Nikon and Canon are leading in the professional market, so it would be *logical* to see teams all over the world use Canon or Nikon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

