Obama Photographer Confronted By Secret Service After Taking Photos in Front of White House
Mannie Garcia, who captured the image of Barack Obama that was made into the famous “Hope” poster by artist Shepard Fairey, is the latest photographer to be confronted by law enforcement for taking photos in a public place.
Last week we told you about the street photographer who was questioned by a police officer after capturing images in Times Square. In this case, Garcia was taking photos in front of the White House yesterday when a uniformed Secret Service officer confronted him and demanded he delete one of the images.
“He just charged me,” Garcia told PDN Pulse. “He came right at me and grabbed my camera. He had his hand on his weapon and said give me that photo and I said no.”
The image in question was one Garcia had captured of two women rolling baby strollers in front of the White House. In the shot, shown below, the uniformed Secret Service officer can be seen at the right, glaring at the camera.

Mannie Garcia was told to delete this photo by the Secret Service officer on the right. ©Mannie Garcia
Garcia was amongst a group of news photographers who were at the White House to photograph rallies in conjunction with World AIDS Day and several other events yesterday. He said he was wearing his press badge which the officer could clearly see.
“He said: ‘I want you to delete the photo. You don’t have my permission.’ And I said, we’re not photographing you. And then I asked him if I was under arrest and he said no. What bothered me the most was that he grabbed the camera and I had to pull it away. I’m not a kid. I’m in my 50s. I have grey hair and he clearly saw my credentials.”
Garcia was able to walk away from the officer with his Nikon D3s and the image intact. Later, Jay Mallin, a photographer friend of Garcia’s, explained what happened to a sergeant in charge of the Secret Service officers. The sergeant told Garcia that the officer was out of line.
“When I showed him the photo, which I did in good faith, the sergeant rolled his eyes and looked at the young officer,” Garcia said. “It was a situation where you had new uniformed Secret Service officer who was new to the beat. Obviously he has had training but not the experience about what should be done.”
Though it may have been an isolated incident, Garcia said the atmosphere has been tense of late.
“Yesterday, in particular, felt like a day of heightened security. It had this mood in the air. But people have a right to be there and you don’t intimidate people by charging them and putting your hand on your weapon.”
(From Jay’s Blog.)





December 3rd, 2010 at 11:33 am
[...] Service agent charged at him, hand on his weapon, and demanded that he delete the photographs. PDN Pulse Blog Archive Obama Photographer Confronted By Secret Service After Taking Photos in Front … __________________ [...]
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:39 am
[...] Service agent charged at him, hand on his weapon, and demanded that he delete the photographs. Obama Photographer Confronted By Secret Service After Taking Photos in Front of White House __________________ [...]
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:14 am
You don’t need credentials to take pictures in public. That part of Manny’s statement is odd. Whether he had credentials is irrelevant.
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:36 am
Another photo-terrorist foiled in the act! Jeez, folks, this is just getting ridiculous! The US and the UK are vying for the title of most oppressive to photography in public. How can we stop this harassment by law enforcement when we are TOTALLY within our rights?
December 3rd, 2010 at 12:53 pm
It appears that this cop immediately escalated to his hand on his gun and then immediately went to physical attack.
If these allegations are correct than this individual should not be entrusted to be carrying a gun as an authority. He appears to not have the demeanor this responsibility carries.
In addition for a law enforcement official to not understand the basic concept of the freedom of an individual to take a photo in public speaks to his own stupidity.
Again if the allegations are true, this individual is a badge heavy arrogant gun carrying buffoon who should be fired immediately.
December 3rd, 2010 at 2:53 pm
Good thing it wasn’t me…Aye Manny! I would have been the first to be attacked by about 10, SS (that ain’t for Secret Service either) officers. I would have told him to go crap in his hat. But that would have been after I got in Face big for touch my gear. At that point I’m sure I would have been the 1st Photog to be shot in front of the White House. Would have loved to see the Czar and his Henchman cover that up!
(Sorry I didn’t want to use my real name or email, because of the Socialist in the White House) If you want my real name ask Manny. I shoot where’s it’s warm all the time. Little White Ball.
December 3rd, 2010 at 3:21 pm
http://www.petapixel.com/2010/08/24/introducing-the-photographers-rights-gray-card-set/
I do NOT Travel in the States (and Canada and Internationally) unless I have these around my neck as credentials.
Not only have I had not trouble (10,000+ digital captures lately) but I have received free upgrades and better treatment at airports.
Keep up the good fight!
CP
December 3rd, 2010 at 3:23 pm
1. You can make a photograph of anything and anyone on any public property, except where a specific law prohibits it.
i.e. streets, sidewalks, town squares, parks, government buildings open to the public, and public libraries.
2. You may shoot on private property if it is open to the public, but you are obligated to stop if the owner requests it.
i.e. malls, retail stores, restaurants, banks, and office building lobbies.
3. Private property owners can prevent photography ON their property, but not photography OF their property from a public location.
4. Anyone can be photographed without concent when they are in a public place unless there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.
i.e. private homes, restrooms, dressing rooms, medical facilities, and phone booths.
5. Despite misconceptions, the following subjects are almost always permissible:
* accidents, fire scenes, criminal activities
* children, celebrities, law enforcement officers
* bridges, infrastructure, transportation facilities
* residential, commercial, and industrial buildings
6. Security is rarely an acceptable reason for restricting photography. Photographing from a public place cannot infringe on trade secrets, nor is it terrorist activity.
7. Private parties cannot detain you against your will unless a serious crime was committed in their presence. Those that do so may be subject to criminal and civil charges.
8. It is a crime for someone to threaten injury, detention, confiscation, or arrest because you are making photographs.
9. You are not obligated to provide your identity or reason for photographing unless questioned by a law enforcement officer and state law requires it.
10. Private parties have no right to confiscate your equipment without a court order. Even law enforcement officers must obtain one unless making an arrest. No one can force you to delete photos you have made.
December 3rd, 2010 at 6:30 pm
Those are a really good idea I don’t think it would have helped during the G-20 in Toronto but it is a good idea in most cases to have those. And they look sharp.
December 3rd, 2010 at 6:33 pm
…and that is really crap what that uniformed Secret Service rookie did. I certainly hope he got re assigned after the bad press this has got for the protective detail. And you can always recover deleted image anyway. there are several programs out there to pull em back unless the card has been over written.
December 4th, 2010 at 6:44 am
FWIW, I’m really quite surprised at this. I live/work near the WH and have been shooting it for 10+ years. The security (including SS) around there is probably the least threatening/intimidating in the DC area. You can (and I have) take pictures for hours. Will someone watch you? Bet on it. Interfere? Never have, in my experience. So I tend to believe the sergeant’s explanation. Still not cool, but not an institutional problem.
December 4th, 2010 at 8:36 am
The person is clearly too young, inexperienced, untrained and simply irrational to carry a gun and be a member of any type of organized law enforcement. I suspect he got to “work” each day with dreams of stopping a terrorist attack on the White House and become a hero.
And on the subject of the White House, where is my Change and Hope? I thought The Messiah was going to reverse the fascism and destruction of civil liberties that occurred under W. Monkey-Boy Bush. If the Messiah was serious about restoring civil liberties he should have a nice chat with this kid. Publicly. And tell him not to let it happen again.
But of course the Hope for the Change for the Change of the Hope was just a tag line for the election. We now return you to our previous program of corporate bailouts and war.
December 4th, 2010 at 1:35 pm
Was this Bozo Uniformed SS or Park Police. If this unprofessional is SS, then he should be demoted to the TSA for acting in this manner. What kind of training did this guy have? Anger / rage problems? Somebody like this guy should not be protecting the White House and is an embarrassment to the USSS.
December 4th, 2010 at 8:35 pm
Big deal. I’m a photographer and a lefty. Im definitely not an apolgist for strong arm law enforcement BUT this secret service agent was new and obviously out of line. His boss said so! What’s the big deal? A bunch of nothing. People need to chill and quit trying to make capital cases out of simple ignorant mistakes by police. Think.
December 6th, 2010 at 12:02 am
[...] andata? L’ha raccontata lui stesso: Garcia stava scattando qualche foto (un po’ controvoglia, si direbbe) al [...]
December 6th, 2010 at 7:50 am
This is the new 15 minutes of fame.
Snappers reporting their daily hassles.
December 6th, 2010 at 6:23 pm
This secret service cop should be fired, plain and simple. This sort of ridiculous things is happening everywhere, on a large and small scale. It happened to me for documenting a local unsafe intersection used by a school. I still have not gotten an apology from the arrogant officials involved; only excuses.
Tin Gods with a little power think they have a right to harass and intimidate photographers and are getting away with it. And they are public employees to boot going around violating the civil rights of citizen photographers.
FYI I wrote an article about my incident and included some useful Photographer’s Legal Rights links for the mutual education of both photographers and the nasty arrogant violators.
http://denver.yourhub.com/Denver/Stories/Opinion/General/Story~913707.aspx
December 6th, 2010 at 9:30 pm
every attack on photography is an attack on democracy
December 7th, 2010 at 7:22 am
FYI I’ve updated my own article on photographers rights and unlawful confrontation to include a link to this story. Mannie, photographers everywhere support you. You were in fact unlawfully assaulted.
http://denver.yourhub.com/Centennial/Stories/Opinion/General/Story~914565.aspx
http://denver.yourhub.com/Denver/Stories/Opinion/General/Story~913707.aspx
Perhaps those of us who’ve been intimidated by police or other ignorance government pointy heads should start an advocacy group. A place where we can tell our collective stories, learn about rights, and gain support.
December 7th, 2010 at 12:39 pm
[...] Source: PDN Pulse [...]
December 9th, 2010 at 1:43 pm
Hey Canadian Photographer – how do you go about getting those upgrades?
December 13th, 2010 at 1:39 pm
[...] our theme of street and news photographers getting hassled by authorities for taking pictures of people in public, we thought [...]